kode adsense disini
Hot Best Seller

Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History

Availability: Ready to download

In the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, a stunningly vivid historical account of the forty-year battle between Comanche Indians and white settlers for control of the American West, centering on Quanah, the greatest Comanche chief of them all.S. C. Gwynne’s Empire of the Summer Moon spans two astonishing stories. The first traces the rise and fall of the Comanche In the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, a stunningly vivid historical account of the forty-year battle between Comanche Indians and white settlers for control of the American West, centering on Quanah, the greatest Comanche chief of them all.S. C. Gwynne’s Empire of the Summer Moon spans two astonishing stories. The first traces the rise and fall of the Comanches, the most powerful Indian tribe in American history. The second entails one of the most remarkable narratives ever to come out of the Old West: the epic saga of the pioneer woman Cynthia Ann Parker and her mixed-blood son Quanah, who became the last and greatest chief of the Comanches. Although readers may be more familiar with the tribal names Apache and Sioux, it was in fact the legendary fighting ability of the Comanches that determined just how and when the American West opened up. Comanche boys became adept bareback riders by age six; full Comanche braves were considered the best horsemen who ever rode. They were so masterful at war and so skillful with their arrows and lances that they stopped the northern drive of colonial Spain from Mexico and halted the French expansion westward from Louisiana. White settlers arriving in Texas from the eastern United States were surprised to find the frontier being rolled backward by Comanches incensed by the invasion of their tribal lands. So effective were the Comanches that they forced the creation of the Texas Rangers and account for the advent of the new weapon specifically designed to fight them: the six-gun. The war with the Comanches lasted four decades, in effect holding up the development of the new American nation. Gwynne’s exhilarating account delivers a sweeping narrative that encompasses Spanish colonialism, the Civil War, the destruction of the buffalo herds, and the arrival of the railroads—a historical feast for anyone interested in how the United States came into being. Against this backdrop Gwynne presents the compelling drama of Cynthia Ann Parker, a lovely nine-year-old girl with cornflower-blue eyes who was kidnapped by Comanches from the far Texas frontier in 1836. She grew to love her captors and became infamous as the "White Squaw" who refused to return until her tragic capture by Texas Rangers in 1860. More famous still was her son Quanah, a warrior who was never defeated and whose guerrilla wars in the Texas Panhandle made him a legend. S. C. Gwynne’s account of these events is meticulously researched, intellectually provocative, and, above all, thrillingly told.


Compare
kode adsense disini

In the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, a stunningly vivid historical account of the forty-year battle between Comanche Indians and white settlers for control of the American West, centering on Quanah, the greatest Comanche chief of them all.S. C. Gwynne’s Empire of the Summer Moon spans two astonishing stories. The first traces the rise and fall of the Comanche In the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, a stunningly vivid historical account of the forty-year battle between Comanche Indians and white settlers for control of the American West, centering on Quanah, the greatest Comanche chief of them all.S. C. Gwynne’s Empire of the Summer Moon spans two astonishing stories. The first traces the rise and fall of the Comanches, the most powerful Indian tribe in American history. The second entails one of the most remarkable narratives ever to come out of the Old West: the epic saga of the pioneer woman Cynthia Ann Parker and her mixed-blood son Quanah, who became the last and greatest chief of the Comanches. Although readers may be more familiar with the tribal names Apache and Sioux, it was in fact the legendary fighting ability of the Comanches that determined just how and when the American West opened up. Comanche boys became adept bareback riders by age six; full Comanche braves were considered the best horsemen who ever rode. They were so masterful at war and so skillful with their arrows and lances that they stopped the northern drive of colonial Spain from Mexico and halted the French expansion westward from Louisiana. White settlers arriving in Texas from the eastern United States were surprised to find the frontier being rolled backward by Comanches incensed by the invasion of their tribal lands. So effective were the Comanches that they forced the creation of the Texas Rangers and account for the advent of the new weapon specifically designed to fight them: the six-gun. The war with the Comanches lasted four decades, in effect holding up the development of the new American nation. Gwynne’s exhilarating account delivers a sweeping narrative that encompasses Spanish colonialism, the Civil War, the destruction of the buffalo herds, and the arrival of the railroads—a historical feast for anyone interested in how the United States came into being. Against this backdrop Gwynne presents the compelling drama of Cynthia Ann Parker, a lovely nine-year-old girl with cornflower-blue eyes who was kidnapped by Comanches from the far Texas frontier in 1836. She grew to love her captors and became infamous as the "White Squaw" who refused to return until her tragic capture by Texas Rangers in 1860. More famous still was her son Quanah, a warrior who was never defeated and whose guerrilla wars in the Texas Panhandle made him a legend. S. C. Gwynne’s account of these events is meticulously researched, intellectually provocative, and, above all, thrillingly told.

30 review for Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History

  1. 4 out of 5

    William Thomas

    As a historian, I will rarely give a general or popular history more than 3 stars. Much the same way I will never say 'an historian'. And no matter the amount of research that goes into popular history, it hardly ever seems to merit so much praise. And that is because it answers no questions, asks no new questions, puts forth none of its own theories, and has no one singular hypothesis. This book, although a fantastic, sweeping history of the Comanche, it is not a work to be discussed as academi As a historian, I will rarely give a general or popular history more than 3 stars. Much the same way I will never say 'an historian'. And no matter the amount of research that goes into popular history, it hardly ever seems to merit so much praise. And that is because it answers no questions, asks no new questions, puts forth none of its own theories, and has no one singular hypothesis. This book, although a fantastic, sweeping history of the Comanche, it is not a work to be discussed as academic history. The most irritating part of the book is the history of Quanah Parker himself. The most bold and interesting history comes from the first half of the book, up until the introduction of the Hays Rangers. What the book does is prove that the Comanche were, without a doubt, the most powerful tribe in American history. But this is not a new idea, as most historians would agree that the Comanche dwarfed all other horse tribes in the West in terms of accumulated wealth- an idea that, before the white man, was unknown to the Comanche. Once they mastered the horse, they ascended quickly from Gollum-like scavengers, a group of hyenas picking up the scraps of others, into the most feared Indians in America. Part of the reason that Western Indian tribes were so feared comes from their lack of domesticity. They did not farm or keep animals for slaughter. They had to hunt on the plains and badlands because farming was not an option. The development of the land in the West around Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming etc was one of the reasons for the Dust Bowl, and by extension, the Great Depression. These lands were not fit for farming, and the plains tribes understood this. However, Americans flooded the land and used all the technology at hand to turn the l;and into life-bearing plots. But I digress. The Comcanche and Apache and Lakota and Sioux were far more aggressive in the West than thier Eastern counterparts due in fact to their need to hunt in order to sustain their way of life on the plains. But this subject is never touched upon in this book. It never puts forth an actual hypothesis. It never answers questions, but instead gives us fact after fact. And while that is useful and entertaining, especially in this case, it does little to advance our actual knowledge of the 'why's'. I do congratulate [EDIT] (the author of) this book for not balking at the violence inherent in the Comanche. Too often historians will shy away from the amoral acts of an Indian tribe in order to preserve the idea of a noble savage. In this, we are treated to detailed accounts of Comanche torture. Cutting off the toes, the fingers and genitals of Spaniards, Americans and other frontiersmen, and stuffing them into their owners' mouths was common practice. Letting hot coals burn through a captive's abdomen was another torture technique often applied. There seemed no end to their torture ingenuity. And Gwynne does not make this a symptom of Europeans in America. Gwynne does not say that this was a practice only developed after the Europeans came and brought war upon the land. Which is in fact a fallacy. War between tribes was never bloodless. It was never so pretty or noble. It was always petty and savage. And to think that the white devil unleashed something sinister within the Indian upon their arrival is no more than PC demonizing and pandering to the modern day tribes. Overall, the book will give the average reader insight into the frontier they did not possess before reading it. It is filled with facts- like the development of the Colt, the relationship between Eli Whitney and Samuel Colt, the Hays Rangers, the torture techniques of Comcanches, the destruction of the Apaches, the transformation of the Comanche from the 1600's- that will entertain and often disgust. But all in all it is well worth the read.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Arah-Lynda

    The desert wind would salt their ruins and there would be nothing, no ghost or scribe, to tell any pilgrim in his passing how it was that people had lived in this place and in this place had died.             Cormac McCarthy The date was October 3rd, 1871.  Six hundred soldiers and twenty Tonkawa scouts had bivouacked on a bend of the Clear Fork of the Brazos, about one hundred and fifty miles west of Fort Worth, Texas. Though they did not know it at the time their presence marked the beginning of The desert wind would salt their ruins and there would be nothing, no ghost or scribe, to tell any pilgrim in his passing how it was that people had lived in this place and in this place had died.             Cormac McCarthy The date was October 3rd, 1871.  Six hundred soldiers and twenty Tonkawa scouts had bivouacked on a bend of the Clear Fork of the Brazos, about one hundred and fifty miles west of Fort Worth, Texas. Though they did not know it at the time their presence marked the beginning of the end of the Indian wars in America. The chosen agent of this destruction was a West Point Graduate and civil war hero named Ranald Slidell Mackenzie.  Mackenzie was a difficult, moody, implacable young man.  The Indians called him No-Finger Chief or Bad Hand because his hand was gruesomely disfigured from war wounds. The nation was booming.  In 1869 The Transcontinental Railroad was completed, linking the industrialized east with the developing west.  Only one obstacle remained, the war- like  Indian Tribes who inhabited the Great Plains. Mackenzies objective was clear.  He was there with his troops to kill Comanches.  Of those, the most remote, primitive and hostile were a band of Comanches know as the Quahadis.  LIke most Plains Indians the Quahadis were nomadic and led by a fierce and brilliant young Chief named Quanah.  Quanah was too young for anyone to know much about him except that he was reported to be ruthless and very clever.  But there was something else, he was a half-breed, the son of a Comanche chief and a white woman.   In fact Quanah’s mother had long been famous, because she had refused on repeated occasions to return to her people.  Her name was Cynthia Ann Parker, a daughter of one of early Texas's most prominent families.  Nearly 40 years earlier in 1836,  she had been kidnapped  at the age of nine by a Comanche war party.   It is this forty year period that Gwynne uses as the backdrop for his narrative.   And he does not pull any punches when describing the brutality of the Comanche war raids.  It was typical for all white men to be killed and scalped, some captured alive suffered a slower, more tortuous death.  Captive women were gang raped, many tortured and killed but some, if they were young would be spared.  Babies were invariably killed in horrific ways, while preadolescents were often adopted by the Comanche or traded to other tribes.   Comanche territory during this period essentially covered the Southern Great Plains, including large chunks of New Mexico and Colorado as well as Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas.  The migrating white man or Anglo-Americans had a difficult  time getting their heads around this, accustomed as they were to tribes in the East who travelled by foot.  The Comanche on the other hand were not only mounted but were the undisputed masters of horsemanship.  Their wild mustangs were fast and they had many, allowing fresh mounts as required, all of which meant that their striking range was huge.  They were not only able to travel large distances at an alarming speed but they were also highly skilled at waging war while mounted.  Their quiver typically held twenty arrows as opposed to the weapons of the white man who in the early days  had to dismount, load, aim and then fire.  Even more time was required to reload.  They simply did not stand a chance against the Comanche who were equally adept at stealing their horses once they had dismounted. Meanwhile, in an effort to stop the raiding and killing,  government authorities were making treaties with the Plains Indians.  Treaties as it turned out that neither the Indians or the Government had any real intention of honouring.   It astounds me that later, when many of the Plains Tribes surrendered and agreed to relocate to the white man’s reservations, they were held accountable and punished for breaking those same treaties that the white man so frequently broke themselves. The Texan solution to the Comanche's  superior ability to fight was to recruit young, single men with a taste for open spaces, danger and raw adventure, whose only purpose would be to hunt and kill Plains Indians, most notably the Comanche.  They soon became known as Texas Rangers.  Sadly though, these young recruits were not supplied with much of anything else, no uniforms, provisions, weapons, training or barracks.  They organized themselves and were largely answerable to themselves. The only thing the government reliably provided was ammunition. As a result many young lives were lost.  The ones that survived were a rough bunch, that drank hard and liked fighting and killing.  It was remarkable then that this group of unmanaged, ruthless ruffians gave its full and unswerving allegiance to a quiet, slender, twenty-three year old by the name of John Coffee Hays.  He was the uber ranger, the one everyone wanted to be like and in time, the one the Comanche feared.  Hays soon realized that the only way to fight the Comanche was to fight like them, mounted and able to fire their weapons while riding.   Still the war raged on and in time an even more devastating plague came to the Great Southern Plains in the form of the “white” buffalo hunters.  The buffalo were the Comanche's primary food source, while their hides were treated and used to provide shields, blankets and clothing.  The Comanche hunted buffalo for sustenance, killing only as many as they could use.  The “white” buffalo hunters killed for profit, taking the hides and leaving the rest of the carcass to rot.  It was not uncommon for each hunter to kill hundreds daily.  It did not take long for the once prolific herds to vanish from  the plains, thereby unalterably compromising the Comanche way of life. Woven throughout this narrative is the story of Quanah Parker, half Comanche, half Texan, and Chief of the Quahadis.   The Quahadis were the one tribe that never signed a treaty with the white man and their Chief, Quanah was never defeated in battle.  He eventually led his people to the reservation and remains a legend as  the last great Chief of the Comanche nation.  I leave you and this way too long review with this actual historic description of the young war chief in battle. A large and powerfully built chief led the bunch, on a coal black racing pony.  Leaning forward upon his mane, his heels nervously working in the animal’s side, with six- shooter poised in the air, he seemed the incarnation of savage, brutal joy.  His face was smeared with black war paint, which gave his features a satanic look…….. A full- length headdress or war bonnet of eagle’s feathers, spreading out as he rode, and descending from his forehead, over head and back, to his pony’s tail, almost swept the ground.  Large brass hoops were in his ears: he was naked to the waist, wearing simply leggings, moccasins and a breechclout.  A necklace of bear’s claws hung about his neck…..Bells jingled as he rode at headlong speed, followed by the leading warriors, all eager to out-strip him in the race.  It was Quanah, principal war chief of the Qua-ha-das. (Captain Robert G. Carter) Highly Recommended !

  3. 4 out of 5

    Anna-Liisa

    I quit reading this book after the fourth chapter. As it is one of the most racist books I have ever read, I am baffled by the glowing reviews it receives. For your consideration: "Thus the fateful clash between settlers from the culture of Aristotle, St. Paul, Da Vinci, Luther, and Newton and aboriginal horsemen from the buffalo plains happened as though in a time warp--as though the former were looking backward thousands of years at premoral, pre-Christian, low-barbarian versions of themselves. I quit reading this book after the fourth chapter. As it is one of the most racist books I have ever read, I am baffled by the glowing reviews it receives. For your consideration: "Thus the fateful clash between settlers from the culture of Aristotle, St. Paul, Da Vinci, Luther, and Newton and aboriginal horsemen from the buffalo plains happened as though in a time warp--as though the former were looking backward thousands of years at premoral, pre-Christian, low-barbarian versions of themselves." Oh really? Then there's this gem: "Making people scream in pain was interesting and rewarding for [the Comanche], just as it is interesting and rewarding for young boys in modern-day America to torture frogs or pull the legs off grasshoppers. Boys presumably grow out of that; for Indians, it was an important part of their adult culture and one they accepted without challenge." Wow. Just, wow. You'd think we'd be a little more forward thinking nowadays than Andrew Jackson was in 1833: "My original convictions upon this subject have been confirmed by the course of events for several years, and experience is every day adding to their strength. That those tribes can not exist surrounded by our settlements and in continual contact with our citizens is certain. They have neither the intelligence, the industry, the moral habits, nor the desire of improvement which are essential to any favorable change in their condition. Established in the midst of another and a superior race, and without appreciating the causes of their inferiority or seeking to control them, they must necessarily yield to the force of circumstances and ere long disappear." Then there's Gwynne's boldfaced claims that are, as far as I can tell, backed up with little to no research. My favorite is his claim that the great Pueblo revolt in 1680 was "very likely" the result of the Pueblo Indians being upset that the Spanish were not doing a good enough job of protecting them from the Apaches. Absolutely no citation to any authority. I don't claim to be an expert in this area of history myself, but that sure was not the impression I got when I was at the Taos Pueblo earlier this year. It sounded to me like it was more the brutal oppression at the hands of the Spanish, but whatever. The worst part is that I had a sinking feeling that the author was going to decide that Quanah Parker was alright at least partially because he was half white. Maybe the author would have proved me wrong, but I just couldn't stomach all his talk about the uncivilized, stone age, savage Comanche who were, according to the author, dirty even by Indian standards. Zero stars.

  4. 5 out of 5

    Lyn

    Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History by S.C. Gwynne, first published in 2010, tells the entertaining and informative, somewhat scholarly account of the Comanche tribe. Gwynne uses the histories of Cynthia Parker (the historic inspiration for Natalie Wood’s character in John Wayne’s The Searchers and the Mary McDonnell character Stands With a Fist in Kevin Costner’s film Dances With Wolves) and her son Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History by S.C. Gwynne, first published in 2010, tells the entertaining and informative, somewhat scholarly account of the Comanche tribe. Gwynne uses the histories of Cynthia Parker (the historic inspiration for Natalie Wood’s character in John Wayne’s The Searchers and the Mary McDonnell character Stands With a Fist in Kevin Costner’s film Dances With Wolves) and her son Quanah as a vehicle to further explore the larger, pre-historic anthropology of this bellicose tribe. Horses and horsemanship are the central components of the Comanche story, some historians and even concurrent observers equated them more with other horse cultures such as the Mongols, Tartars or Magyars than with other Native American tribes. Other ethnographers and anthropologists have compared the warlike Comanche with the culture of ancient Sparta or of the ancient Celts and Vikings. Though probably mostly historically accurate and fairly objective, and certainly sympathetic to the history of the Comanche people in the 1800s, this book is written from the Anglo-American perspective and rarely wholeheartedly embraces the culture of the Comanche. Brutally and graphically violent (probably necessary considering the context) this reminded me of Larry McMurtry’s The Berrybender Narratives and even Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian, or the Evening Redness in the West - not for the squeamish.

  5. 4 out of 5

    Lawyer

    Sam Gwynne's History of the Spanish, the Texans, the Americans and the Comancheria Sam C. Gwynne attended Princeton and Johns Hopkins Universities. He's spent most of his life as a journalist. He spent almost twenty years as a correspondent, bureau chief, and Chief Editor for twenty years. Gwynne's work has appeared in the New York Times, Harpers, California, Texas Monthly, among other publications. Gwynne was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for general nonfiction for Empire of the Summer Moon Sam Gwynne's History of the Spanish, the Texans, the Americans and the Comancheria Sam C. Gwynne attended Princeton and Johns Hopkins Universities. He's spent most of his life as a journalist. He spent almost twenty years as a correspondent, bureau chief, and Chief Editor for twenty years. Gwynne's work has appeared in the New York Times, Harpers, California, Texas Monthly, among other publications. Gwynne was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for general nonfiction for Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History. Gwynne lives in Austin Texas with his wife and daughter. His most recent book is Rebel Yell: The Violence, Passion, and Redemption of Stonewall Jackson. First Ed., Scribner, New York, New York, 2010 Popular American histories focus their attention on the Native Americans of the High Plains. George Armstrong Custer remains an icon of glorious defeat. S.C. Gwynne does a great service in providing us with Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History. Although Gwynne's bibliography shows a great amount of previous literature regarding the Comanche, his work will acquaint those of us unfamiliar with Indians of the Southern Plains with the Comanche Indian Nation. To actually call the Comanche an Indian Nation is a misnomer. They were a band of loosely associated nomadic bands that ranged from Colorado to Eastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, and down through the Panhandle of Texas all the way to the outskirts of present day Austin and San Antonio. The land they occupied was named Comancheria by the Spanish. The Comanche had no central political or social organization. War chiefs were chosen strictly on the basis of an individual's ability to recruit followers and successfully raid their opponents for horses and captives. The land known as Comancheria The Spanish, Mexicans, and Texans were all taken by surprise by the ferocity of Comanche attacks. The Comanche were the first Native American opponents of all the aforementioned to fight from horseback. The Comanche consistently out-maneuvered not only the Indian tribes they had previously dominated but also European and American colonists. Gwynne offers captivating portraits of individuals frequently left out of histories of the American West. While early history of the Comanche remains much of a mystery, Gwynne brings the Comanche into sharp focus from 1830s Texas until their ultimate surrender in the late 19th Century. Students of Texas history will discover unsettling policies of government leaders during the time of the Republic of Texas that was nothing short of an extermination of the Native Americans. Although the Comanche was their true opponent, early Texans showed a lack of discernment in implementing the Republic's policies, attacking tribes who were peaceful or had already chosen to follow the "white man's road." My wife, a native Texan, was completely unaware of much of the Republic's actions against the Indians, as these incidents were completely left out of her school texts from elementary school through college. Do not consider Gwynne's work or this review to be a replication of the sorrow recounted in Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West. The Comanche were brutal in their attacks on any opponent. The Comanche subjected those they defeated in battle to torture and mutilation. Captured infants were routinely murdered, being of no immediate use to the band. Women were routinely repeatedly sexually assaulted and mutilated. Those women who were not murdered were enslaved to increase the female workforce in the band. They were also passed to their captor's relatives and friends as sexual objects. Many did not survive their captivity. Those who were either rescued or purchased back from the Comanche ultimately were outcasts in white society. On occasion, white captives were adopted by the band who took them away from their homes and families. Such is the case of the best known captive of the Comanche, Cynthia Ann Parker. Cynthia Ann was captured when she was nine. She was adopted by the band who captured her. She married a Comanche known as Peter Nocona and gave birth to three children, one who would grow to become the principal war chief of the Comanche, Quanah Parker. Cynthia Ann Parker was kidnapped at age nine by a Comanche war band in 1836. Her family was killed. She was adopted by the tribe, ultimately marrying Comanche brave Peter Nocona. She gave birth to three children, including Quanah Parker, the last free Comanche Chief until his surrender. Cynthia died of influenza in 1871, after several unsuccessful attempts to return to her Indian family. Peta Nocona, Chief of the Quahadi Comanche Band, married Cynthia Ann Parker, fathering three children by her, including Quanah Parker. The date of his death is disputed. According to some he was killed in an attack by Texas Rangers at the battle of Pease River in 1864. According to son Quanah, Rangers did not kill his father, but he died of wounds several days later that he had received in fighting with Apaches, not the Rangers. Quanah Parker was born in 1845. He was never named principal war chief by the Comanches although he did fight as a warrior at the battle of Adobe Walls along with Apaches. He surrendered in 1875 and was named Chief of the Apaches by the United States Government. He died in 1911. The Parker family story was the inspiration for Allen Lemay's western masterpiece "The Searchers," subsequently filmed by John Ford in 1956, starring John Wayne and Natalie Wood. Although both book and movie were highly acclaimed, the story told there comes nowhere close to the dramatic truth of the history of the Parker family. It's an iconic American film, but the truth overwhelms one of Hollywood's best. Gwynne's work is a complex story of a lesser known era in American history. It is a story worth knowing. Gwynne tells it well. I would encourage anyone interested in expansion of the American frontier to read it. One not fully familiar with Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico geography would be well served to have maps readily available to appreciate the range of the Comanche travels and the speed in which they achieved it. Highly recommended. This is a solid Five Star read.

  6. 4 out of 5

    Montzalee Wittmann

    Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History by S.C. Gwynne is full of great research and racism. This book has only a tiny, tiny mention about Quanah. This book is very misleading by the title and blurb. It should be called, "How the Horrible Redman was Subdued by Mighty Whiteman". Only once did it mention how James Parker, the head man that thought it would be a great idea to build a home in the middle of In Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History by S.C. Gwynne is full of great research and racism. This book has only a tiny, tiny mention about Quanah. This book is very misleading by the title and blurb. It should be called, "How the Horrible Redman was Subdued by Mighty Whiteman". Only once did it mention how James Parker, the head man that thought it would be a great idea to build a home in the middle of Indian territory while there were many events of attacks. A home far from anyone else and further than anyone else had gone. James was a man that had killed 4-5 Indians but he didn't call it murder because they were Indians. He was a corrupt man in other ways, too many things to bring up here. This is the only thing brought up against a white man and it was brief. A true Whitewash book. The book was good at the research but too bad the facts he presented was all one sided. If it was a history book, why not show both sides? If it was about Quanah, how about tell us about him? That is why I got the book! What a waste of my time! It just made me mad. I almost stopped several time but I wanted to finish so I could review it. The one star review is for research, and it doesn't let us give a no star option. Going in my worse-book-ever file.

  7. 5 out of 5

    Bill

    I bought this at the airport, it looked like a good read. A chapter or two in the language and stereotypes became really disturbing. His version of human history, summed up in two pages is just bizarre.The language, and long discredited concepts that Gwynne prattles along with are apalling."Higher civilizations", of which the Plains Indians were "three to four millennia behind". And oh yes, the Native Americans were "premoral, pre-Christian, low-barbarian versions" of Europeans. And of course t I bought this at the airport, it looked like a good read. A chapter or two in the language and stereotypes became really disturbing. His version of human history, summed up in two pages is just bizarre.The language, and long discredited concepts that Gwynne prattles along with are apalling."Higher civilizations", of which the Plains Indians were "three to four millennia behind". And oh yes, the Native Americans were "premoral, pre-Christian, low-barbarian versions" of Europeans. And of course they were, "savage, filthy, wore their hair long" according to the insightful Gwynne. As for Native religion, there was "no tendency to view the world as anything but a set of isolated episodes, with no deeper meaning." Wow. Once again thanks for your insight Mr. Gwynne. His sources for the nature of the Comanches, and of Native Americans in general consist almost entirely of the accounts and opinions of 18th and 19th century European's, of whom most were directly involved in the seizing of Native lands and the extermination of Native peoples. This book would have surely been a best seller in 1910, when the stereotypes and ignorance that Mr. Gwynne puts forth were yet to be discredited, but for it to have been published in 2010, and to have received many positive reviews and very little critisism is both disturbing and astounding.

  8. 5 out of 5

    Vanessa

    Other reviewers' claim that this is an unbiased historical account is laughable. This is yet another telling of a war written by those who won it. Gwynne states that he constructed the book using "a large number of firsthand accounts from the era." The firsthand accounts written are naturally all of settlers and the military, and all of them appalled and offended that anyone could dare attack them and deny the greatness of Manifest Destiny. The books and articles referenced in the end are, as fa Other reviewers' claim that this is an unbiased historical account is laughable. This is yet another telling of a war written by those who won it. Gwynne states that he constructed the book using "a large number of firsthand accounts from the era." The firsthand accounts written are naturally all of settlers and the military, and all of them appalled and offended that anyone could dare attack them and deny the greatness of Manifest Destiny. The books and articles referenced in the end are, as far as I can tell, predominantly written by non-Natives. There isn't even a reference section for interviews, and no respectable book written about Native culture or a tribe should at no point reference interviewing tribal members about their own history! The author repeatedly makes frustrating unreferenced assumptions that he passes on as fact. These assumptions certainly make the book a more entertaining read, but that doesn't make it true. The descriptors that Gwynne uses are far from historically accurate. He describes Comanche culture as stone aged, barbaric, totally disorganized and lacking in any sort of theism. Basically devoid of any substance or intelligence. I might be more inclined to believe him if he actually referenced some Comanche sources in this regard. Additionally, those are loaded terms with heavy implications. He refers to Quanah's peyote "cult." A cult? It is not that I feel that this book needs to be some huge exploration of Comanche culture. But given that it is supposed to be about Comanche history, it should offer far more insight about the actual people rather than looking at them almost exclusively through a settler's lens. For example, within just a few pages, Quanah transforms from being a bloodthirsty war chief to a master negotiator who agrees to move his people to the reservation. Yet there is no exploration or real insight about that significant change. As I started the book, I was intrigued by the deep and personal accounts of the settlers, an interesting story worth telling and hearing. But the missing voice of the Comanche people in a book purportedly written about them became too deafening a silence, and I eventually was frustrated enough to write this review.

  9. 4 out of 5

    Michael

    A great combination of history and biography in the play of Manifest Destiny in the American conquest of the Great Plains. The emotional challenge of this read for me is how to accommodate an admiration of a tribe of never more than 10-20 thousand succeeding in halting their colonizers for two hundred years (first the Spanish and later the Mexican, Texan, and American nations) while not judging them over the inhumanity of their methods. They were nomadic but defended their buffalo lands against A great combination of history and biography in the play of Manifest Destiny in the American conquest of the Great Plains. The emotional challenge of this read for me is how to accommodate an admiration of a tribe of never more than 10-20 thousand succeeding in halting their colonizers for two hundred years (first the Spanish and later the Mexican, Texan, and American nations) while not judging them over the inhumanity of their methods. They were nomadic but defended their buffalo lands against all comers. Every battle called for death to all warriors, torture and mutilation of all adult male captives, and dispatch of any infants with quick a death. Women were raped and beaten, and their children were either adopted, enslaved, or held for ransom. This all-in approach to enemies was nothing personal against white invaders, but a tradition applied equally to their generational foes: the Apache, Tonkawa, Navaho, and Ute tribes. This is what happened to the Parker clan in 1836 at their foolish settlement at a site about 90 miles south of Dallas. Though they built a walled fort, when the Comanches attacked most of their 16 adult men were in the fields and the gate was left open. Three men and two women were brutally killed and three children and one woman was carried off, including one Cynthia Ann Parker, age 9, who was adopted and assimilated into the tribe. Details of the raid and treatment of the captives were provided by the memoirs of the “woman” Rachel Parker Plummer, who was 17 when captured with her infant and subsequently recovered (the subject of the iconic move “The Searchers.” Later, as a grown woman, Cynthia became famous when recaptured with her baby daughter in a brutal cavalry raid while skinning buffalo and loading meat as the wife of a chief. Her defiant resistance to return to white cultural ways captured the imagination of the American public. She refused to speak English and perpetually tried to run away to her people, eventually dying of pneumonia. A different kind of fame arose when it came out that her mixed race son, who at age 12 escaped during the raid and grew up to become the brilliant warrior and leader of the reclusive Quahadi band of the Comanche, Quanah Parker. The Comanches were unbeatable due to their complete adaptation to the horse for warfare and hunting and effectively making a whole economy out of breeding, stealing, and trading in horses,. The fleet Iberian horses brought in large numbers to the continent by the Spaniards in the early 17th century (with a lineage from the steppes of Central Asia) were well suited for the arid grasslands of the West and Great Plains. The horse allowed the Plains Indians to follow the buffalo herds and chase them down for the kill using lances. While most tribes took to use of this imported gift, including adoption of the technology of bridles, bits, and saddles, the Comanche became special geniuses at fighting on horseback. According to Gwynne: They resembled less the Algonquins or the Choctaws than the great and legendary mounted archers of history: Mongols, Parthians, and Magyars. "Feats of Horsemanship", by George Caitlin Until the appearance of the Colt 45 repeater pistols, soldiers or the voluntary force of Texas Rangers going up against the Comanche with single-shot rifles or muskets all had to fight on foot. The Comanches, pure poetry in motion, could fire up to a dozen arrows at full gallop in the time it took for their enemies to reload. They were especially adept at hiding along the side of the horse using a strap and firing arrows under their steed’s neck. Thus, their artistry of first stealing or running off the horses of their opponents was the first step to doom for any but the largest and most intrepid forces throughout the 18th century and half of the 19th. But by around 1858 when the Texas Rangers took up Colt weapons and punitive expeditions of the Army in the 1860s brought small howitzers with exploding shells into battle the equation of advantage to the Indians reversed. Sometime around 1700, the Comanches, who called themselves Nermernuh (“The People”), moved from present day Wyoming out onto the southern plains. After driving out the Apaches and other tribes, their domain, called the Comancheria by Santa Fe traders, comprised about 240,000 square miles, comprising most of western portions of present day Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas and parts of eastern New Mexico and Colorado. Their heartland was the Llano Estacado in the Texas Panhandle, which is a high plain of oceanic grassland broken by rocky outcrops at an elevation of up to 5,000 feet. For a long time after Coronado’s passage through there it was “as unknown a region to Americans as unexplored regions of Africa.” Comanche lands known as the Comancheria The Comanche attack on the Parker fort could be seen as the opening salvo of a 40-year war between the tribe and the American nation. The year of the Parker attack, 1836, coincided with Mexican General Santa Anna’s total victory at the Alamo and his later execution of about 350 captured Texans at Goliad. That success had the side effect of making many martyrs and strengthen the resolve of the onery Texans. General Sam Houston’s victory and subsequent treaty marked the birth of the Republic of Texas. Nationhood was supposed to be a temporary phase before joining the United States, but U.S. leaders were worried that pushing statehood might provoke a war with Mexico and the issue of adding another slave state into the Union was a political hot potato. Left on their own to deal with the Comanches, the Republic chose to develop a volunteer cadre of Texas Rangers with the mission to exterminate the Comanche by any means possible. They are the heroes of many fictional tales of the West (e.g. McMurtry’s “Lonesome Dove” saga and Phillipe’s “The Son”), but in fact their typical illiteracy meant that most of their skirmishes with the Comanche went unrecorded. Also, they usually numbered about 100 or less at any particular time. The Civil War led to a substantial depopulation of the Army forts throughout the West, allowing the raiding of the Comanches to escalate with impunity. About a third of the tribe by then had been moved to a joint reservation in Indian Territory with their friends the Kiowa and, ironically, their enemies the Apache. The Comanche used the reservation as a home base to stage raids on other reservation tribes and white settlements in Texas. By 1864, their raids on the new Navaho reservation in New Mexico Territory and U.S. supply caravans for them led the military commander for the region, General Charleton, to send Colonel Kit Carson on a first major punitive raid into the Comancheria. In the Battle of Adobe Walls, he boldly led 330 soldiers and 72 Apache and Ute scouts into an attack on a Kiowa hunting camp near the top of the Texas Panhandle. Over time an estimate of about 3,000 Comanches and Kiowa from neighboring camps were recruited into the battle, and only the shock and awe of two mountain howitzers saved his bacon and allowed him to escape the fate of Custer at the hands of the Cheyenne and Lakota Sioux in 1876. Though no victory, the precedent of this incursion can be seen as the beginning of an escalating campaign which in seven years would result in a final defeat of the Comanche nation. General Ranald Mackenzie was a key player in this campaign, starting with his leading a force of 3,000 cavalry into the Llano Estacado region. It failed because most of his horses were driven off, but survival with little loss still stood as a form of victory. Another contributor to Comanche defeat was the near extermination of their food source, the buffalo. The completion of the transcontinental railroad in 1869 was a not only a massive stimulus to settlers pursuing cattle ranching, but an open door to an industry of white buffslo hunters due to ready shipment of hides to eastern markets. An estimated 31 million buffalo were slaughtered between the end of the 1860s and 1881. This more than anything else contributed to demoralization and willingness to submit to reservation life by Comanche holdouts. Once Quanah committed to his fate of defeat, he blossomed into a properly civilized leader for his tribe and successful partner with the white victors. He wangled ways of beating the corrupt federal administration of the reservation at their own game, such as in lucrative income from grazing rights. He build a mansion in the Wichita Mountains to house his large family of eventually nine wives and many children. Though not a very spiritually inclined tribe, he became one of the founders of the Native American Church and the use of peyote in their sacrament and vision quests. This book is well orchestrated and covers a lot of ground in its relatively short length. It is not quite as eloquent and moving as my favorite history of the Indian wars, Hampton Sides’ “Blood and Thunder”, which focuses on Kit Carson and the Navahos. This book included a nice collection of photos, although Quanah was so reclusive there are none of him until his reservation days. The mystery is finally revealed for me on the remarkable success of his essentially Stone Age tribe in holding out so long in the face of the unstoppable force of American settlement and control of the West. A personal connection to the book for me comes from my growing up in Oklahoma and living for a period in my youth in the Hill Country of Texas. It was great to get a human and respectful angle on a tribe so dreaded and subject to tales that make them out to be evil savages (e.g. the infamous “Blue Duck” character in McMurtry’s saga). Comanche faces (Wiki)--Quanah is in the center

  10. 4 out of 5

    Jennie

    This book is not about Quanah Parker, his mother, or the Comanche. It's really about How the White Man Conquered the Savage, Primitive, Warmongering Barbarians. My complaints about this book are many, but I'll try to keep it simple. Mainly, it's because a "history" written in 2010 contains things like this: There were no witnesses to this great coming together of Stone Age hunters and horses, nothing to record what happened when they met, or what there was in the soul of the Comanche that underst This book is not about Quanah Parker, his mother, or the Comanche. It's really about How the White Man Conquered the Savage, Primitive, Warmongering Barbarians. My complaints about this book are many, but I'll try to keep it simple. Mainly, it's because a "history" written in 2010 contains things like this: There were no witnesses to this great coming together of Stone Age hunters and horses, nothing to record what happened when they met, or what there was in the soul of the Comanche that understood the horse so much better than everyone else did. Whatever it was, whatever sort of accidental brilliance, whatever the particular, subliminal bond between warrior and horse, it must have thrilled these dark-skinned pariahs from the Wind River country. Throughout the book, "Indians" are described as savage, primitive, and "low-barbarian." Oh - and Indian. I found it disingenuous of Gwynne to describe in detail the massacre of Cynthia Ann Parker's family and her capture, then acknowledge his description as "needlessly bloody." He describes most of the Comanche raids in those "needlessly bloody" details, including what seems like every rape, scalping, and disembowelment, but white men's raids on "Indian" villages (the Sand Creek Massacre being the one notable exception) get a brief tally of this many killed/this many captured. Gwynne's writing style is just annoying, filled with "What happened next was one of the greatest/worst/most...." or "No one knows why...." This isn't a story being told around a cowboy campfire. Give me some facts and let me decide, thank you very much. Then there's this description of Quanah: He was also strikingly handsome: fully dark-skinned Comanche but with a classical, straight northern European nose, high cheekbones, and piercing light gray eyes that were as luminous and transparent as his mother's. He somehow looked completely Indian without looking Asiatic, and could have served as a model of how white people thought a noble savage ought to look.... "Indian" voices appear once in awhile, as if Gwynne suddenly remembered the part that comes after the colon in the book title. Most of this book is told in a very, very strongly white voice. I'll leave you with this, perhaps the "best" quote from this book, and then I'm going to quietly toss it in the Goodwill pile, after which I will dance the dance of joy that I never have to look at this again: ...Rachel became entirely Comanche. She shed her pioneer clothing for Indian buckskins, and, though she does not comment on it, would have been as filthy and bug-ridden as any of the Comanches, who were notable even among Indians for their lack of hygiene. So there you go. Enjoy.

  11. 4 out of 5

    Jon Donley

    As a native Texan who grew up in the former Comancheria, and whose family (both white and native) has deep roots there, I've always been fascinated by the blood-feud between Texans and Comanches. I was once an editor for Ted Fehrenbach, and admire his classic on the Comanches, and found this to be an excellent, well-told companion piece. Ironically Comanches were the proximate cause of Texas developing into the home of its most implacable foes, as Spain desperately recruited Anglo Americans to s As a native Texan who grew up in the former Comancheria, and whose family (both white and native) has deep roots there, I've always been fascinated by the blood-feud between Texans and Comanches. I was once an editor for Ted Fehrenbach, and admire his classic on the Comanches, and found this to be an excellent, well-told companion piece. Ironically Comanches were the proximate cause of Texas developing into the home of its most implacable foes, as Spain desperately recruited Anglo Americans to stand as a buffer between New Spain and the Indian Nation that was its most dangerous foe. And there was irony on the other side, too, Spain lost its territory (and much more besides) to the "human buffer" that had been thrown to the Comanche lances. The book does a great job of painting the big picture of the history of the Comanches' ascent, invasion and conquering of its desired homeland, and in setting up the coming clash with the Texans. It always seemed to me that the reason the Comanches and Texans were such bitter enemies were that they were so much alike. Both were fighting for a homeland, neither intended to let anyone stand in their way, and both were capable of almost unthinkable savagery. The story of Quanah, which is threaded through the book, but is actually only central to the last act, was a great, honest portrait of a man worth knowing. One episode of the story of the Comanches is missing from the book, as it is from most tales of the conflict. In at least one case, the Comanches early on made a lasting peace agreement with the whites. In the mid-1840s, the founder of Fredericksburg learned that he'd been scammed into purchasing land for his German settlers that just happened to be located deep inside Comanche territories. In scouting out the territory, he found himself confronted with what was described as thousands of Comanches, whose campfires surrounded his camp. Fortunately though, the Germans, who were by temperament much different from the English-Gaelic settlers of the north-Central Hill Country, came to a peace agreement with the Comanche chiefs, including Buffalo Hump, that allowed them to live there unmolested. In the mid-1990s, the descendants and relatives of those German settlers (including at least one from Germany) met in Fredericksburg with a large group of Comanches from Oklahoma - including the tribal leader and a granddaughter and great-granddaughter of Quanah Parker. There was a powwow celebrating the 150th anniversary of this treaty, which is the only one known to have never been broken by either side in the troubles between whites and Indians. This is a great read. Jon (note that I bought the Kindle version)

  12. 5 out of 5

    Clif Hostetler

    Comanche history and culture is the focus of this book. The subtitle of the book markets itself as a biography of Quanah Parker, but he doesn't show up until the final fourth of the book. Starting with the pre-columbian history the book describes the revolutionary change brought about by the advent of horses on the plains. It enabled the Comanche who had been culturally among the lowliest among the tribes to transform into being the invaders from the north. They were a branch that had separated Comanche history and culture is the focus of this book. The subtitle of the book markets itself as a biography of Quanah Parker, but he doesn't show up until the final fourth of the book. Starting with the pre-columbian history the book describes the revolutionary change brought about by the advent of horses on the plains. It enabled the Comanche who had been culturally among the lowliest among the tribes to transform into being the invaders from the north. They were a branch that had separated from the Shoshoe of Wyoming that moved into the region of Texas displacing the Ute, Pueblo, Navaho, and Apache from their ancestral lands. They seem to have been the most successful Indian tribe at taking advantage of the horse by becoming skilled as mounted warriors. The Comanche were the principal opponents of the Spanish as they set up missions in the northern part of old Mexico. The Spanish and later the Mexican government came to accept the Comanche as a protective buffer from French—and later American—encroachment from Louisiana territory. The beginning of what this book refers to as a forty year Comanche War begins in May 1836 with the attack of the Parker Clan settlement in east Texas. Five men were killed, two women wounded, and two women and three children were taken captive. Among those kidnapped was Cynthia Ann Parker, a blue-eyed nine-year-old. She grew up among the Comanche, married a chief, and had several children one of whom was Quanah who became the legionary leader of the tribe in the latter years of the "Comanche War." Ever since the book Bury my Heart of Wounded Knee I've been inclined to be sympathetic with the cause of the American Indian as they resisted the white settlers taking away their land. Empire of the Summer Moon shifts this dynamic by making all sides in the conflict look evil. The horrifying atrocities of the Sand Creek Massacre are portrayed together with the nauseating torture Comanches inflicted on their captives. I was surprised to learn that the Comanche inflected their cruelty on their Indian enemies as well. Readers with low tolerance for descriptions of violence should avoid this book. The final quarter of the book tells of the exploits of Quanah Parker. Quanah emerged as a dominant figure in the Red River War, clashing repeatedly with Colonel Ranald S. Mackenzie. With whites deliberately hunting American bison, the Comanche's primary livelihood, into extinction, Quanah finally surrendered in 1875 and peaceably led the Quahadi to the reservation at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. In his years on the reservation Quanah became successful businessman/politician, got himself appointed "principal chief" of the Comanche by the US governement, and even became an acquaintance of Theodore Roosevelt. He died in 1911. The book has a chapter about the Medicine Lodge peace conference of 1867. I found that of special interest because I have attended, in my younger days, several of the modern day pageants held by that community to commemorate that event. I found the adjectives used by the author to describe the event to be interesting. (Underlined emphasis below is my addition.) Such beatific urges toward peace, combined with relentless and brutal raiding by comanches in Texas and the Indian Territory led to the last and most comprehensive treaty ever signed by the Indians of the southern plains. The conference that spawned it took place in October 1867 at a campground where the Kiowas held medicine dances, about seventy-five miles southwest of the present site of Wichita, Kansas. The place was known as Medicine Lodge Creek. The participants were members of a U.S. peace commission and representatives of the Comanche, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Kiowa, and Kiowa Apache tribes. The conference was the last great gathering of free Indians in the american West. The event was magnificent, surreal, doomed, absurd, and bizarre, and surely one of the greatest displays of pure western pageantry ever seen. Nine newspapers sent correspondents to cover it. Some of the speeches given by the Indian Chiefs at that conference provide a melancholic, poignant, and eloquent summary of the situation of the plains indian tribes at that time in history. The following link is to the speech by Ten Bears, a Comanche chief. http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ksb... As much as a third of the Commanche tribe was not represented at the council. Quanah was a member of one of the Comanche bands that was not present, but ironically Quanah himself was present as a young eighteen-year-old because he happen to be visiting a Cheyenne group at the time.

  13. 4 out of 5

    Asha

    Astonishingly, uncomfortably, unforgivably racist portrayal of the indigenous peoples of the Americas. The (fascinating) history that exists in this book is buried so far beneath the author's prejudice that his account is wholly untrustworthy. This book is useful only as a study in modern-day manifestations of racism that go unacknowledged in mainstream American culture. Here are four illustrative examples of the casual racism entrenched in the author's vocabulary throughout the book: 1. “While t Astonishingly, uncomfortably, unforgivably racist portrayal of the indigenous peoples of the Americas. The (fascinating) history that exists in this book is buried so far beneath the author's prejudice that his account is wholly untrustworthy. This book is useful only as a study in modern-day manifestations of racism that go unacknowledged in mainstream American culture. Here are four illustrative examples of the casual racism entrenched in the author's vocabulary throughout the book: 1. “While the Comanches had a limited vocabulary to describe most things—a trait common to primitive people—their equine lexicon was large and minutely descriptive." (34) 2. “[The Spanish] style of colonialism worked best on sophisticated, centrally ruled tribes like the Aztecs and Incas. It did not work at all on the low-barbarian, precivilized, and non-agrarian tribes of northern Mexico.” (54) 3. And this extraordinary speculation about the moral evolution of civilizations: "What explains such a radical difference in the moral systems of the Comanches and the whites they confronted? Part of it has to do with the relative progress of civilizations in the Americas compared with the rest of the world. [...] Once the Indians figured out how to plant seeds and cultivate crops, civilizations in North and South America progressed at roughly the same pace as they had in the Old World. Cities were built. Highly organized social structures evolved. Pyramids were designed. Empires were assembled..." (59) 4. And most unbelievably: "Thus the fateful clash between settlers from the culture of Aristotle, St. Paul, Da Vinci, Luther, and Newton and aboriginal horsemen from the buffalo plains happened as though in a time warp--as though the former were looking backward thousands of years at premoral, pre-Christian, low-barbarian versions of themselves." The disgust I felt at the author's 18th century ethnographic "analysis" of the Comanche people made it impossible to do more than skim the rest of the book. I wish I could give this 0 stars for reductive and unapologetic historical revisionism. I suppose it serves as an excellent reminder of how far we have to go in race relations in the U.S.

  14. 5 out of 5

    Chrissie

    This is a very good book; it is well researched and chock full of information, but I only liked it. That is why I am giving it three stars. Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History looks at the situation of the Comanches in 1836, starting at the Fort Parker Massacre. It follows them through to the demise of their last chief in 1911. This massacre can be seen as “the beginning of the end” of both the Indian This is a very good book; it is well researched and chock full of information, but I only liked it. That is why I am giving it three stars. Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History looks at the situation of the Comanches in 1836, starting at the Fort Parker Massacre. It follows them through to the demise of their last chief in 1911. This massacre can be seen as “the beginning of the end” of both the Indian Wars in America and of the Comanches. The book follows all those touched by the May 1836 massacre, the subsequent kidnapping and rescue attempts of the five of the Parker clan who were captured--Cynthia Ann Parker (9 years), her younger brother John Richard Parker, her cousin Rachel Parker Plummer (17 years) with her infant son, James Pratt Plummer, and aunt Elisabeth Kellogg. Fort Parker is near present-day Groesbeck, Texas. Cynthia Ann lived 25 years with the Comanches, married Chief Peta Nocona, and gave birth to three children, including son Quanah Parker, who would become the last Chief of the Comanches. At the age 34, she was recaptured by the Texas Rangers and forcibly returned “home”. The question is what was home then? She missed her children and the Native American way of life and never readjusted to white society again. Rachel Parker Plummer wrote of their captivity--Rachael Plummer's Narrative Of Twenty-One Months Servitude As A Prisoner Among The Comanchee Indians. Published in 1838, it was an immediate hit, sought after abroad and in the States. As the events are told readers learn about the Col. Ranald S. MacKenzie exploits both during the Civil War and then during the Indian Wars, the repercussions the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848 had on Indian affairs, the Gold Rush of 1849, the development of weapons such as the Walker Colts, Spencer Carbines and the Sharps Big 50s, the birth of the Texas Rangers and the Dragoons, the extinction of the buffalo, Native Americans’ susceptibility to and contagion by cholera, measles, malaria, whooping cough and syphilis, the expansion westward of settlers and the ever increasing demand for more land, the Dawes Act of 1887 followed by the Jerome Act of 1892--all of which had significance for the fall of the Comanche nation and all Native Americans. The book is comprehensive and detailed. The battles between different tribes and white settlers are many and are studied in minutia. Is there a balanced presentation of the white versus the red point of view? Pretty much, but in the wording one senses the author’s admiration of those few who were able to outwit and conquer the Native Americans. I noticed this particularly in reference to Texas Ranger John Coffee “Jack” Hays, for whom the author has only words of praise. I felt the author to be exhilarated by the battles. I just wanted these episodes to end. The atrocities committed on both sides are presented. The audiobook is read by David Drummond. The tempo is uneven. At times he reads way too fast. The Parker clan is large, and when numerous names are thrown at you ten a second, it is impossible to keep them straight. Drummond fails to lower the speed when the text becomes complicated; he accelerates instead! Every time he sped up, I needed him to slow down! I do NOT recommend listening to the audiobook. Many times, I had to rewind, to re-listen, to understand what was being said. Read the paper book instead. The audiobook includes a PDF file that provides a clear map of the cities, rivers, battles and places spoken of in the book. It is handy to glance at as you listen to the book. Related reading: *Ride the Wind is a book of historical fiction about Cynthia Ann Parker. *Follow the River (4 stars) *Blood and Thunder: An Epic of the American West (4 stars) *Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West (4 stars)

  15. 4 out of 5

    El

    I didn't really need to read this book because I've seen Pocahontas and remember very vividly this whole song. Reading this book was sorta like reliving that song and that's a damn shame. Aside from how freaking white this book is, and not even commenting on the occasional racist undertones (or overtones), it's just not even that great of a book. The subtitle leads the reader to believe that this will be about Quanah Parker when in reality that played such a small part of whatever it was Gwynne w I didn't really need to read this book because I've seen Pocahontas and remember very vividly this whole song. Reading this book was sorta like reliving that song and that's a damn shame. Aside from how freaking white this book is, and not even commenting on the occasional racist undertones (or overtones), it's just not even that great of a book. The subtitle leads the reader to believe that this will be about Quanah Parker when in reality that played such a small part of whatever it was Gwynne was blathering on about. It was fact after fact after boring fact, and I don't think I learned much of anything new outside of the very few facts he included about Quanah himself. Everything else was stuff I already learned in high school history classes that told the same story from the same whitebread perspective. Then, just as I was feeling confident that the book was almost over and I could relax again, Gwynne went and started talking (briefly) about the Native American Church which Quanah influenced. So, okay, this could be interesting, I don't know a whole lot about it, so I woke up a bit. And then this happened: "[Quanah] had to fight to keep prosecutors away from his peyote cult." Cult? Religion vs Cult. 'Nuff said. "The white man goes into his church and talks about Jesus, but the Indian goes into his tipi and talks to Jesus." Quanah Parker I'm not going to sit here and pretend that there was any innocent party involved in this violent and horrific part of American history, and no one should. But this book is just one more reminder of how much attention the white experience has received. I cannot understand how this was a Pulitzer nominee. Unless Pulitzers are just like Grammys and are based on word-of-mouth and is just a popularity contest. In the end I give this 2 stars, not because I thought it deserves 2 stars, per se, but because the wee bit of information that actually involved Quanah Parker was interesting and was the sole reason I wanted to read the book. But even those parts were a stretch. Meh.

  16. 5 out of 5

    Tim

    Every now and then one runs across an historical non-fiction book that is breathtakingly enlightening. Commancheria - the millions of acres of treeless plains encompassing northern Mexico to present day Nebraska, the land of the 5 principal bands of the Commanches, a culture centuries behind the development of the eastern Indian tribes, and intertwined with the buffalo herds. Commancheria - a region so forcefully held by the Commanches that the westward tide of Anglo-Saxon expansion was held at Every now and then one runs across an historical non-fiction book that is breathtakingly enlightening. Commancheria - the millions of acres of treeless plains encompassing northern Mexico to present day Nebraska, the land of the 5 principal bands of the Commanches, a culture centuries behind the development of the eastern Indian tribes, and intertwined with the buffalo herds. Commancheria - a region so forcefully held by the Commanches that the westward tide of Anglo-Saxon expansion was held at a standstill for nearly 30 years at the 98th meridian. The Commanches drove out other indian tribes - Apaches clear into New Mexico, Cheyenne to the north, and chose to be at war with eastern Indians and whites alike. They were close to the last of the major plains indian groups to surrender, and one group that faded even further under reservation life - not interested in adapting to the dominating culture. The author does not spare the reader details of the warlike nature of these people, nor does he condemn or romanticize the tragedy from hindsight. No quarter was asked by this group, nor any given, and S.C. Gwynne admirably refrains from heavy handed opining on the rights and wrongs of the long-running conflict. In that sense, this book is refreshing for its candidness, lack of sugar coating, and its scope - fitting in the broad clash of European and Native American cultures which we are familiar with, but tying it into the Texan/American collision as well as inter-tribal warfare. He details the emergence of the Texas Rangers and why, the vacuum created by the civil war, the individual of Quanah Parker, who was the son of an abducted white woman and a band leader of the Commanches, tactics of warfare, the buffalo hunters who perhaps killed off the hopes of any Commanche band to live even on a restricted basis as they had in the past. An excellent read of the Southwest plains history of the US.

  17. 5 out of 5

    David Brickley

    This is a book that I think every American should read. In the beginning we came into this land and immediately began displacing all of the aboriginal peoples who had dwelled here for many centuries. Yet I would wager that almost nobody knows anything about those peoples other than what watching Wagon Train has showed them. Which leaves out anyone born later than 1960. This is all to say that this book does an excellent job of showing, with most excellent clarity, the dichotomy of a native peopl This is a book that I think every American should read. In the beginning we came into this land and immediately began displacing all of the aboriginal peoples who had dwelled here for many centuries. Yet I would wager that almost nobody knows anything about those peoples other than what watching Wagon Train has showed them. Which leaves out anyone born later than 1960. This is all to say that this book does an excellent job of showing, with most excellent clarity, the dichotomy of a native people trying to live as they always had, coping (or not coping) with an unimagined influx of a completely other culture usurping their land and destroying their way of life. That's one aspect; the other is the daunting challenge that the westward flowing Americans (the white ones) faced as they impinged upon the established native tribes' territory and way of life. This author does an excellent job of laying out the case for both sides without handing down judgement of either side, all in a writing style that is more story-teller, ala Bernard DeVoto, than pedantic historian research paper. It appears to be extremely well researched, and through it all is the the very strong thread of the lineage of the Commanch warrior-chief Quanah, who was the embodiment of what was, and who became the embodiment of what was to be for the vanquished native Americans.

  18. 5 out of 5

    Max

    Hard hitting, rugged and raw history that feels chillingly authentic. Neither the white man nor red man comes out well in this retelling of the brutal collision of the Comanche and relentlessly expanding America. I was quickly disabused of any idyllic notions. Well written, detailed and informative, highly recommended for anyone who wants to know how the West was really won. Odd and End Thoughts: GR readers seem to be hotly divided as to whether Gwynn’s depiction of the Comanche is racist or simp Hard hitting, rugged and raw history that feels chillingly authentic. Neither the white man nor red man comes out well in this retelling of the brutal collision of the Comanche and relentlessly expanding America. I was quickly disabused of any idyllic notions. Well written, detailed and informative, highly recommended for anyone who wants to know how the West was really won. Odd and End Thoughts: GR readers seem to be hotly divided as to whether Gwynn’s depiction of the Comanche is racist or simply tells it like it was. I fall into the latter group. That nomadic hunter gatherers were ruthless is hardly unusual. I enjoyed Gwynne’s notion of a time warp. Equating Herodotus’ view of the ancient Celts to the Anglo view of the Comanche, he sees the nineteenth century Celt (Scotch-Irish) now encountering a version of himself from centuries past. This book definitely strikes a nerve in some. These reactions may say as much about how non-native Americans view themselves and their legacy as the Comanche. I seem to remember from school that the white man killed all the buffalo thereby starving the Indians out of their native existence. But in Gwynne’s account, the plains Indians had been decimated and the remaining few interred on reservations before the wild buffalo were exterminated, albeit just before. Interestingly, Cynthia Ann Parker who had been captured by the Comanche at the age of 9 was adopted by a Comanche family and married a Comanche chief could never adapt back to life in white America when taken back by her relatives at the age of 33. She always tried to run away to return to her hardscrabble Comanche life and nomadic home in the wilds of the plains. However her son Quanah by her Comanche husband Peta Noconah born and raised in the Comanche tribe to become a warrior chief, after surrendering to reservation life when 27 was not only able to adapt to the white man’s ways, but prosper and achieve prominence and respect in the Anglo world. For an eye opening look at a Hollywood makeover, compare a picture of the real Cynthia Ann to her as portrayed by Natalie Wood as the character Debbie in the John Wayne movie, The Searchers, which is based on Cynthia Ann’s uncle’s attempts to take her back from the Comanche. http://www.imdb.com/media/rm155528755... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cyn... Sorry, couldn't make the HTML work for me to show the above images.

  19. 4 out of 5

    Greg

    Wow! Was this written in 1908? I was surprised and very disappointed by this book. I was taken in by the author's very good writing. The way he writes is so engaging and it reads better than most history books I've read. There were two things that bothered me about the book. First, were the inaccuracies. I'm not as well read in the History of the American West as many people, but I was finding common mistakes, especially when he was talking about other tribes. What bothered me more was the fact th Wow! Was this written in 1908? I was surprised and very disappointed by this book. I was taken in by the author's very good writing. The way he writes is so engaging and it reads better than most history books I've read. There were two things that bothered me about the book. First, were the inaccuracies. I'm not as well read in the History of the American West as many people, but I was finding common mistakes, especially when he was talking about other tribes. What bothered me more was the fact that I felt I was reading something written by someone a hundred years ago. With the amount of effort and research was involved I was disappointed that the author still depicted the Comanches without any depth. He acknowledges that they were brutal (which they were) but offers no reason, just the fact that brutality is synonymous with lack of civilization. He also glosses over the brutality of American settlers and the American army, which is ironic considering how detailed he described the Comanche attacks on American settlers. The real problem is the author could not get out of the 19th century ethnocentric view of Indigenous Americans. I just shake my head that he still puts Native Americans in the outdated perception that the path to civilization is by turning nomadic communities into farmers, and therefore Native Americans were at the "earliest" point of this continuum. Sadly, I think this book is getting lots of awards. I was hoping for someone who wouldn't rely on hollow assumptions and actually delve into this really interesting part of American history. I guess that's too much to ask.

  20. 4 out of 5

    David Ober

    Popular history is a strange genre that often seems suspended between genuine academic rigor and amateurish quackery. For every book of popular history written by a well regarded historian and aimed at educating the general public, there are at least a hundred written by a layperson that, even if he or she does the appropriate amount of footwork, usually ends up reproducing antiquated historical narratives. While a professor of history might understand how to read nuance into old sources, an ama Popular history is a strange genre that often seems suspended between genuine academic rigor and amateurish quackery. For every book of popular history written by a well regarded historian and aimed at educating the general public, there are at least a hundred written by a layperson that, even if he or she does the appropriate amount of footwork, usually ends up reproducing antiquated historical narratives. While a professor of history might understand how to read nuance into old sources, an amateur too often takes the word of a writer from the past at his or her word. S. C. Gwynne’s book on the Comanche’s, Empire of the Summer Moon, is just such a book. Gwynne’s lack of understanding of the past causes him to repeat racist tropes from the 19th century that have no place in the modern day. I knew little about Empire of the Summer Moon when I picked it up, except that it provided a lengthy history of the Comanche tribe alone with a recounting of the raid of the Parker family homestead, an incident that would go on to influence the John Wayne and John Ford film The Searchers. While reading the book, however, something seemed off. There was a certain leering quality to the way in which Gwynne described Comanche violence. There’s nothing inherently wrong about describing Native-American violence against white settlers. Across the centuries and over the course of many wars between whites and Native-Americans, atrocities were of course committed on both sides. But Gwynne often presents these acts of violence with little historical context, especially early on, and more troubling he continually returns to the word “savage.” While he applies the term to the violent actions of the Comanche and not necessarily to the Comanche themselves, the word has such a charged racist history that it would have been best to avoid. But I soon realized that the language and the manner in which Gwynne decontextualized Comanche violence presaged a shockingly racist book. Even after this early warning sign, I continued to read, expecting popular history to offer its usual Eurocentric bias. But as I got deeper into the book, Gwynne’s racist attitudes became even more prevalent. The attitudes and beliefs that Gwynne espouses about the Comanche people are almost certainly relics of the 19th century, and it became a fascinating, if at times deplorable example, of how 19th century discourse has survived into the 21st century. Like many writing in the 19th century, Gwynne represents the Comanche as a chronological throwback, an image of Europeans translated back into time. In recounting the impact that the introduction of the horse would have on the Comanche, Gwynne writes of the “astonishing change” that occurs because of “what this backward tribe of Stone Age hunters did with the horse” (28). You can see from Gwynne’s language how he moves from what he believes are merely descriptive terms, like the use of savage to describe incidents of violence earlier on in the book, to pejorative, qualitative language, like the term “backwards” in the above excerpt. This pattern repeats itself again and again in the book. It is an intriguing example of how racism simmers underneath Gwynne’s writing until it finally reaches a full boil and settles down once again. Gwynne further explains that despite the Comanche ability to incorporate horses into their culture, “[t]hey remained relatively primitive, warlike hunters; the horse virtually guaranteed that they would not evolve into more civilized agrarian societies” (31). Here, in language that is oddly reminiscent of how some English spoke of the Irish’s dependency on potatoes during the potato famine, Gwynne points to the horse as a detriment, preventing the Comanche from becoming farmers (which should be read as assimilating to white American culture). Any cultural development that does not eventually lead to Anglo-American style agriculture and socio-political institutions are perceived as headed in the wrong direction. While Gwynne manages to acknowledge Comanche skill at riding, he simultaneously robs them of the ability to reason when discussing the Comanche horse culture. Discussing the shrouded introduction of horses into Comanche country, Gwynne writes, “Whatever it was, whatever sort of accidental brilliance, whatever the particular, subliminal bond between warrior and horse, it must have thrilled these dark-skinned pariahs from the Wind River country” (32). Relying on the assumption that Comanche human beings must have had some kind of mystical relationship with their horses, Gwynne can only imagine that the incorporation of horses into Comanche life and subsequent technological development to tame and breed horses must have been “accidental.” It never even occurs to Gwynne that the Comanche could possibly observe the natural world around them and logically manipulate both nature and their own society in order to better fit their own needs. Gwynne never provides a full and complete image of contemporaneous white culture. He seems mostly concerned with comparing military technological and tactical differences between American settlers and whites (like a lot of popular history, Gwynne is often obsessed over military matters to the exclusion of the social, cultural, and economic). He decries how the Comanche treat their women, which is certainly fair enough. But he never notes that because of coverture laws, women in antebellum America had the legal status of property. He lingers on images of Comanche violence, but nowhere does he discuss the fact that American settlers in Texas were importing slavery and its systemic sins of forced labor, torture, rape, and extra-legal execution. Nowhere does he mention that the violence of slavery imposed by whites dwarfed the violence committed by the Comanche on almost every level. It’s truly incredible how racist discourse from the 19th century influenced Gwynne’s writing. He even uses the term “barbarian” in what is presumably an anthropological sense. This is an outdated term popularized in the sciences by Lewis H. Morgan, John Lubbock, and Frederich Engels, all 19th century scientists. The continued use of this single word long past its expiration date characterizes Gwynne’s writing and mindset. At one point he defends his project by noting that we shouldn’t pretend as if American-Indians were naïve innocents who lived in a perfect state of nature. I agree. And if Gwynne were more familiar with academic research about Native-Americans, then he would realize that the image of Native-Americans as a culture of Adams and Eves has been out of fashion for decades. I also don’t think the alternative to describing Native-Americans as pure innocents is to resurrect racist ideas from hundreds of years ago. If Gwynne’s book were just an isolated piece of poorly written popular history, then there wouldn’t be too much of a story here. But S.C. Gwynne’s Empire of the Summer Moon was actually a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. This means that a large number of journalists not only did not see a problem with the racism of Gwynne’s text, but they believed that this was the sort of historical work worth celebrating. If nothing else, Gwynne’s book and its apparent success is an instance of discourse’s inertia. We like to think that language and ideas are always changing, moving forward and, ideally, improving. But the inertia of discourse suggests that backwards concepts from the past will remain with us unless there is a strong concerted effort to push against them.

  21. 4 out of 5

    Camie

    There is a lot to take in here for anyone who's interested in how the US came into being. The war with the Comanches and other indigenous tribes lasted for four decades as white settlers arrived usurping buffalo herds and invading tribal lands. Part of the story is about Cynthia Ann Parker who was kidnaped and adopted as a young girl and her son Quanah who became the last and greatest Comanche Chief. It's a well researched and written account, but it is often pretty gruesome in the telling. If y There is a lot to take in here for anyone who's interested in how the US came into being. The war with the Comanches and other indigenous tribes lasted for four decades as white settlers arrived usurping buffalo herds and invading tribal lands. Part of the story is about Cynthia Ann Parker who was kidnaped and adopted as a young girl and her son Quanah who became the last and greatest Comanche Chief. It's a well researched and written account, but it is often pretty gruesome in the telling. If you like me have enjoyed fictional books like Lonesome Dove and others which are told from the Texas Rangers point of view beware this nonfictional book will change your views of this time period in history. 5 stars

  22. 5 out of 5

    Brian

    So far I am extremely disappointed in this book . I picked it up after Having finished " Bury my heart at wounded knee " (amazing novel) and similarly was expecting a more honest , transparent view of the Indian American wars . However so far the labels savage , primitive And violent have all been assigned to the Comanches. Gwynne highlights the violence toward settlers without explaining that these same settlers were stealing native lands with no restraint much less remorse. They were also driv So far I am extremely disappointed in this book . I picked it up after Having finished " Bury my heart at wounded knee " (amazing novel) and similarly was expecting a more honest , transparent view of the Indian American wars . However so far the labels savage , primitive And violent have all been assigned to the Comanches. Gwynne highlights the violence toward settlers without explaining that these same settlers were stealing native lands with no restraint much less remorse. They were also driving the buffalo to near extinction but Gwynne attributes this to "profound change" by "opportunistic men". Gwynne is so quick to demonize the comanches but neglects to reveal that Slavery was alive And well in texas. Texas was notorious for harsh oppression towards blacks , and mexicans. Moreover In 199th century Texas women were legal property of their husband. Hence they were often abused and lived lonely lives. Not so much with the Comanches but with numerous other tribes women who had been kid napped by natives and later CHOSE to stay with their captors! There is a famous painting of an exchange between Delaware indians and settlers and the children of the settlers refuse to return to their former Lives! Furthermore Gwynne dares to make the case that historians have " often refused even to Acknowledge that the white women had been victims of abuse ". Nothing could be further from the truth , American historians will often emphasize so called merciless attacks from Indians and always seem to ignore that the u.s army openly attacked and slaughtered whole villages filled with women and children . Sand creed Massacre , The murdering of navajo women in children in a slanted horse race, and wounded knee come to mind, however it is very convenient of Gwynne to not expand on topics of white brutality which categorized the Indian American wars . I challenge those who praise this story to read primary native sources to understand this situation in a better light. All the sources complied by Gwynne come from white settlers. Lastly Gwynne fails to acknowledge that Red Clouds "Ogala Siox" was the first nation to militarily defeat the United States on the field of battle, forcing them to sign a peace treaty. This happened in 1868, and is well documented, which can be clearly seen in the fact that tensions came to a breaking point over such treaties in the take over of wounded knee in 1973. Instead Gwynee makes the ludicrous claim that the Comanche were the only ones with enough gall to resist the U . S government Even worse are reviews claiming Gwynne remains neutral . On page 43 Gwynne clearly states "it is impossible for me not to make moral judgements about these people" he highlights Comanche violence and then judges them with vivid descriptions and strong accusations . In terms of the Parker family he claims they are "righteous, hard nosed, innocent " even says they played their sweet little fiddles at night painting a perfect picture of an innocent child dealing with a wild savage . It's disturbing so many love this book, I guess most are uneducated in the subject of American Indian wars and have personal bias dating way back to their ancestors . The fact this book became a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize highlights the issue westerners have with their own brutal history ; They refuse to be honest.

  23. 5 out of 5

    Tripp

    I can't decide whether this book is the best nonfiction I have read all year, or whether it is the best in the past few years. This is the sort of book that rises above its subject matter, thanks to narrative pace, blending in of context and the quality of the writing. The book tells the story of the Comanche Empire which, having mastered horse warfare, defeated all enemies until the late 19th century. It took the US decades to find a way to defeat them. Much of the story is of two cultures clash I can't decide whether this book is the best nonfiction I have read all year, or whether it is the best in the past few years. This is the sort of book that rises above its subject matter, thanks to narrative pace, blending in of context and the quality of the writing. The book tells the story of the Comanche Empire which, having mastered horse warfare, defeated all enemies until the late 19th century. It took the US decades to find a way to defeat them. Much of the story is of two cultures clashing. Part of that clash is social. The Texan and then American settlers believed in staking out private claims, while the Comanche believed in roaming free. Another part is military. The Comanche based their combat around the use of the horse. The Texan and American way was to fight on foot. In the initial clashes, the Comanche way was superior. The American side prevailed in part, because it evolved its military approach faster. Another more disquieting part of the story highlights another of the book's great strengths. The Comanche, like many Native American peoples, tortured their enemies. Unlike the Eastern tribes, the Plains tribes also used rape as a weapon. Gwynne does not hold back in describing how common this practice was. He equally describes the horrors inflicted upon tribal villages by Texan and American vigilantes and by troops. I've rarely seen a writer take such an evenhanded approach to atrocity. The book delves into many subjects including reservation policy, the settling drive (with its parallels to the West Bank,) the import of the Colt pistol, and the way that the US can turn its villains into its grand statesmen. If this one is in your reading pile, move it to the top.

  24. 4 out of 5

    Robert Delikat

    I have read a number of books on native peoples and it’s always rewarding when they are somewhat balanced. For example, books by Joseph Marshal III consider a history of Native Americans much more comprehensively than S.C. Gwynne does in Empire of the Summer Moon. Marshall, while perhaps because of his own ethnicity, does not only write of the war, weapons and carnage of the combatants but also of their cultures and the backdrops and backgrounds of what led to and obtained during war. Reading Gw I have read a number of books on native peoples and it’s always rewarding when they are somewhat balanced. For example, books by Joseph Marshal III consider a history of Native Americans much more comprehensively than S.C. Gwynne does in Empire of the Summer Moon. Marshall, while perhaps because of his own ethnicity, does not only write of the war, weapons and carnage of the combatants but also of their cultures and the backdrops and backgrounds of what led to and obtained during war. Reading Gwynne’s historical account leaves one with the distinct feeling that early frontiers-men and -women were innocent, helpless and harmless people who were the targets and victims of inhuman, barbaric and savage criminals. Worse, because Empire of the Summer Moon is really only about war, the bias becomes even more dramatically conspicuous. In Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, Jack Weatherford does not sugarcoat the ruthlessness of the Mongol army or its conquering of sometimes truly innocents subjugates. However, it also considers the social structure, culture and Mongol human nature albeit quite different from that of most westerners even of that time. Truly, the book often paints a pretty grizzly picture of events but, lord, at least it seemed balanced. Gwynne does not seem to even try to write dispassionately in any kind of historically accurate and unbiased manner. Perhaps most appalling are the remarks of a typical reviewer of this book: “This book should be required reading at our universities because it puts to rest the myth of the noble peace-loving savage. The book is informative, factually accurate and entertaining.” Entertaining? Had this book a scintilla of accuracy, to call the book entertaining is more than a little abominable.

  25. 5 out of 5

    Curtis Seven

    I'm not sure that comparing the fights against the Commanche in Texas to the Sioux Wars is really a topic that will bring a universal agreement as to who fought best and so on. The description of the tactics used by the Commanche in their fights and their horsemanship are identical to accounts of the fights in the northern plains and the skills of the Lakota and Northern Cheyenne. The Sioux and Commanche share some common things as both were horse tribes, they both drove other tribes from the bes I'm not sure that comparing the fights against the Commanche in Texas to the Sioux Wars is really a topic that will bring a universal agreement as to who fought best and so on. The description of the tactics used by the Commanche in their fights and their horsemanship are identical to accounts of the fights in the northern plains and the skills of the Lakota and Northern Cheyenne. The Sioux and Commanche share some common things as both were horse tribes, they both drove other tribes from the best hunting grounds and were brutal at times, then both used horses as a symbol of power, and they actually used relatively similar guerrilla techniques. The span of time of active conflict was apparently different with the Southern Indians being destroyed and forced onto reservations first before the Lakota their allies were later in the century. My point is that whether you dispute which fought best is at best a distraction each has it's own unique story to tell. Assertions that one was greater than the other just strike me as that, assertions and I'm just not sure this book makes the case or profits by it. All the same it's an important topic and book I'd recommend I'm sure there are lots of opinion to counter balance mine as well.

  26. 4 out of 5

    David

    This book is about the Comanche, one of the most powerful and warlike tribes of the American Southwest. It actually covers several separate "stories" over the course of the book. First, there is the history of the Comanche people themselves from their earliest beginnings to their final fate as reservation Indians, plains warriors made to become farmers. There are a lot of chapters about warfare between the Comanche, other Indian tribes, and the Spanish and the Americans, and woven through it, th This book is about the Comanche, one of the most powerful and warlike tribes of the American Southwest. It actually covers several separate "stories" over the course of the book. First, there is the history of the Comanche people themselves from their earliest beginnings to their final fate as reservation Indians, plains warriors made to become farmers. There are a lot of chapters about warfare between the Comanche, other Indian tribes, and the Spanish and the Americans, and woven through it, the stories of Cynthia Ann Parker, one of the most famous white women of the Old West who was captured as a child by the Comanche, raised as one of their own, later was "rescued" (actually recaptured) by whites, and lived a miserable life in captivity as the celebrated ex-squaw of a Comanche war chief. Her son, however, was more famous still - Quanah Parker, last of the Comanche chiefs, first and only "Chief of Chiefs" (in a tribe that had no precedent for such a title), a "reformed" Indian warrior who once murdered and scalped his way across the American Southwest, but later became a politician, a school board member, and as he told a Texas State Fair crowd towards the end of his life, "A taxpayer, just like you." This book, like Quanah Parker, is full of conflict. Empire of the Summer Moon has been highly praised and rated, and nearly won a Pulitzer. It's a good book, well-written and interesting and full of fascinating, sometimes gruesome, stories. But it's also been heavily criticized. A lot of Native Americans, unsurprisingly, do not like its depiction of the Comanche. Here on Goodreads, many people have given it poor ratings because of "racism, colonialism," etc. We as Americans suffer enormous collective guilt over what we did to the Indians. Nowadays, it is hardly even debatable that we committed atrocities and stole their land. The fact that this is just the way things were done a few centuries ago, and we're only now, worldwide, shifting to a global society that kinda sorta no longer approves of bigger, more technologically advanced countries invading smaller countries and taking their land and subjugating their populations just because they can, does not seem to mitigate the "original sin" of America's founding. (And Canada and basically every other country in the Western hemisphere.) So understandably, when talking about how "savage," "primitive," and "bloodthirsty" some Indians were, it raises hackles today. Those are loaded terms, and S.C. Gwynne uses them a lot. He repeatedly refers to the Comanche as "stone-aged" and observes that they had "no sense of history," "lacked the elaborate social structure of other tribes," and so on. It is not done in an intentionally patronizing way, and he certainly describes the atrocities and corruption for which Texas and the United States (for much of the book, the two are not synonymous, and the Comanche most certainly drew a distinction between the hated "Texans" and everyone else) were responsible. Despite what some people have written, this is not a Comanche-bashing book or one that says White Man good, Indian bad. The problem is, the things Gwynne says are objectively true. The Comanche were a stone-aged civilization (notwithstanding their eventual acquisition of firearms, which they could not repair or maintain, only knew how to use). And I'll just say this: Comanches were terrible people. I don't mean by that that every single Comanche was evil, or that whatever their faults as a society, that justified white people exterminating them and taking their land. But let's be clear - the Comanche, like most of the plains tribes, were vicious. They fought to the death, and captives were routinely gang-raped and tortured to death. As Gwynne points out, this set them apart from Eastern Indians, who also frequently practiced torture, but not so much rape. Plains warfare was brutal and merciless. But if you believe there is such a thing as objective right and wrong, if you have any qualms at all about cultural relativism, then you have to have qualms about a civilization in which it is a social norm to rape and torture to death anyone who's not of your tribe. And make no mistake, the Comanche and their neighbors were doing this long before Europeans came to the New World, it's not something they were taught by the White Man. The "Noble Savage" myth, which Gwynne describes being very much alive during the 19th century, often hindered how the United States dealt with the Comanche because many Americans, including members of Congress, genuinely believed that the Indians were only warlike and vicious in response to white provocations, and that if they were dealt with fairly and peacefully, they would also be peaceful, good neighbors. Their entire history said otherwise. The Comanche were never going to settle down and stop raiding or raping and torturing captives until forced to. How exactly we should have gone about this, or whether we should have even been there to try, is another question. And certainly once the pattern started, of Comanches committing atrocities upon whites (just as they had upon the Mexicans, and the Apaches and the Kiowa and the Navajo and many other tribes), whites committed atrocities right back. One can kind of understand how Texans faced with Comanche aggression came to believe that "the only good Indian is a dead Indian" even while being appalled at the sentiment. There weren't really any "good guys" but there also weren't any clear cut "bad guys." If you believe whites were the bad guys for being on the Indians' land - well, maybe, but population migrations happen, and the Indians certainly moved about and exterminated other tribes and took their land, long before it was done to them by non-Indians. It's easy to see how this book raises conflicting feelings and some strong reactions. One of the criticisms I will say is more valid is that Gwynne only seemed to consult historical records by Americans and other Europeans. There are still Comanche alive today. I would have liked to have heard their own version of their tribe's history, and I may search out any available sources. I don't know if modern Comanche dispute the early settlers' accounts of their ancestors' savagery, or if they claim it was justified in response to white encroachment on their land, or if they also accept that this was the way things were back then, and that it's better that that way of life is gone. All of that being said... Empire of the Summer Moon was very educational, and you'll surely learn a lot whether or not you agree with the author's viewpoint. (And to be clear, most of what I say above is my viewpoint - the author tries to stay more or less objective, though at times it's hard to be non-judgmental about the extremely gruesome and sadistic way in which the Comanche treated captives.) The Comanche, "primitive" or not, were not stupid. They practiced brilliant strategy and could be brave, sneaky, and adaptable as the situation required. They started as true primitives, but like most plains tribes, it was the arrival of the horse, first brought by the Spanish, that transformed them. The horse was not a native to North America, but by the time the Texans and America had to contend with the Comanche, the Comanche had been horseback riders for hundreds of years and it was in their blood. We often assume today that battles between soldiers and Indians were always one-sided affairs except when, as at Little Big Horn, the Indians had overwhelming superiority in numbers. But in fact, early on the Indians were far superior militarily to the Europeans and Americans. While guns certainly gave the white man an advantage (Indians would buy, trade, or steal for firearms, but could never produce or maintain them), early firearms were no match for Comanche bows, that were deadly out to 20 or 30 yards and could be fired many times faster than the single-shot muskets and carbines of the bluecoats. Also, at first the Texans practiced European warfare tactics - dismount to face a charging enemy with your guns. Against mounted cavalry like the Comanche, this was suicide. The Comanche had a vast "empire" and rightly perceived Texas as encroaching upon it. So when the two civilizations met, it was inevitable that there would be bloody warfare, and at first, whites were unprepared for just how numerous and powerful the Comanche were. For a time they actually turned back westward expansion and rolled back the frontier. Several more times in the 19th century, before the Comanche were pacified for good, they would break out of their reservations and quietude and go on a rampage that would practically shut down all commerce and throw the entire West into a panic. The Comanche led to the formation of the Texas Rangers - a small force whose size and exploits may have been exaggerated, but which nonetheless was the first truly effective Indian-fighting force in the West. They learned to hunt, track, and fight Indian style, and when supplied with what was at first an obscure new invention that no one else wanted - the Colt 6-shooter - they suddenly had weapons that could truly let them fight the Comanche on their terms. The history of Indian fighting is interesting wherever you stand on the Cowboys & Indians division, because it's a true military history - the Comanche weren't just war-whooping savages attacking like orcs, they used strategy and tactics and intelligence (they knew when Army units were diverted elsewhere, such as for the Civil War), and they picked their battles. Though they also made frequent mistakes, usually more diplomatic than military. For example, they considered taking white women captive, raping and torturing them, and then ransoming them back to be just normal business practice, and probably never really understood just how implacably this set white men against them. I did have a bit of a problem with the titular premise of the book - that the Comanche ruled an "empire," akin perhaps to the Mayans or the Aztecs. In fact, as Gwynne points out, the Comanche were divided into five or six large "bands" who considered themselves all one people, but were led by different chiefs, none of whom had authority over the others, and there was no grand council coordinating all Comanche (at least not until the Quanah Parker era, and then only nominally). This was a mistake whites frequently made - they would negotiate a peace treaty with one particular band of Comanches, and think they had signed a treaty with the entire Comanche tribe, when in fact all the other Comanche neither knew nor cared about any agreements with some other band. And the Comanche were also unlike the Navajo (about whom I know a little) or most of the other well-known large tribes, in that, as Gwynne says, they had little in the way of art, culture, history, or formal tribal structure. That is not to say they had no art or culture, or that their tribes were run anarchistically, but they really were quite "primitive," even compared to other Indians. So to speak of a Comanche "empire" seems to be a bit of an exaggeration - what the Comanche actually had was a very large territory over which they hunted and raided and were the acknowledged lords of the plains, until the white man came along. The latter part of the book is mostly about Quanah Parker. Quanah, the half-white, half-Comanche son of Cynthia Ann Parker (from whom he was separated at age 12, never to see her again), was a truly remarkable individual. Described as a giant among Comanche and unusually strong and intelligent, he suffered some prejudice for his white blood but proved himself over and over again to be a better Comanche than any of his detractors. (The Comanche also were not particularly racial purists - it had long been their practice to capture children from other tribes, and the Mexicans, and then the whites, to raise as their own, supposedly in part because Comanche women, spending long, hard years on horseback themselves, had a very low fertility rate.) He become a notorious war leader, and hated his mother's people, the Texans, in particular. This is another one of those great contradictions we are confronted with. Quanah Parker, later in life, became feted and celebrated as a "civilized" Indian. He adapted to his life as a homeowner and a celebrity and a politician, was fascinated by new technology, owning a telephone and an automobile. He was friends with Teddy Roosevelt. But this same man had once ridden the plains and raided white settlements. There is no documented evidence that Quanah personally raped and tortured anyone, but he was known to harbor a vicious hatred for white settlers, he led Comanche war parties, and this was what Comanche war parties did. So, you can draw your own conclusions. Quanah sensibly refused to go into those sorts of details later in life. In summary, this was a fascinating, somewhat flawed book. It told me a lot of things about the Comanche, some of which I realize I need to treat with some skepticism until I read some other primary sources. It has at least inspired me to go looking for other books on the same subject from which I might get other perspectives.

  27. 5 out of 5

    Marcelle

    It's interesting, I'll give it that. And I'm learning more than I thought I would. But I'm over half way through the book and Quanah Parker hasn't risen past the toddler stage. (I got so frustrated just waiting for his mother's story to finish that I googled her to cut to the chase.) Much of it is repetitive. Chapter 1, the Comanches were bad - stab, burn, rape, kill, steal. Chapter 2, the Comanches were bad - stab, burn, rape, kill, steal. etc etc. It does nothing to move the plot forward. (The It's interesting, I'll give it that. And I'm learning more than I thought I would. But I'm over half way through the book and Quanah Parker hasn't risen past the toddler stage. (I got so frustrated just waiting for his mother's story to finish that I googled her to cut to the chase.) Much of it is repetitive. Chapter 1, the Comanches were bad - stab, burn, rape, kill, steal. Chapter 2, the Comanches were bad - stab, burn, rape, kill, steal. etc etc. It does nothing to move the plot forward. (The author points out that the Texans weren't much better - I'm just grateful I wasn't born then and there.) Every time he introduces a new character, he goes back in time and then ends it at their death and then jumps back to that one time in band camp and digresses to someone else and GAH! I need my history to be linear! When someone dies in Chapter 2, it doesn't help to revive them to collaborate what someone else says in Chapter 10. It just makes the history seem more like a bunch of anecdotes and confuses the hell out of me so that I'm not certain who did what when and where. It needs more maps than the simple one in the beginning (that lacks quite a bit of info.) Especially when you are talking about particular battles and movements. Maybe if I was a Texan and knew my state history, this wouldn't be problem.

  28. 5 out of 5

    Myke Cole

    Easily one of the best works of narrative nonfiction I have ever read, and buttressing my strongly held belief that non-historians write the best works of history. Gwynne’s strength here (apart from just dynamite writing that rivals the best novelists in terms of prose quality, dramatic narrative and compelling characters - all supported by first class scholarship) is his unflinching reckoning of BOTH white and Native American atrocities during this turbulent epoch of conflict. He provides a har Easily one of the best works of narrative nonfiction I have ever read, and buttressing my strongly held belief that non-historians write the best works of history. Gwynne’s strength here (apart from just dynamite writing that rivals the best novelists in terms of prose quality, dramatic narrative and compelling characters - all supported by first class scholarship) is his unflinching reckoning of BOTH white and Native American atrocities during this turbulent epoch of conflict. He provides a hard and frank look at the Comanche Wars of the late 19th C. and lets the facts stand as they are, leaning on the inherent drama of the narrative to engage the reader. It’s a magnificent tactic and one that pays off handsomely. What a fantastic book. It’s richly deserves the praise it has received.

  29. 4 out of 5

    Jonathan

    I can not believe that Goodreads leads it's synopsis of this book by saying it is in the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. As many people have written in previous reviews of this book, the author is completely careless in his use of racial loaded language like: primitive, stone-age, uncivilized, savage, etc; he writes with a triumphant tone when describing the development of the Texas Rangers and the final campaigns of the US Army against the Comanche. While Gwynne insists that he is t I can not believe that Goodreads leads it's synopsis of this book by saying it is in the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. As many people have written in previous reviews of this book, the author is completely careless in his use of racial loaded language like: primitive, stone-age, uncivilized, savage, etc; he writes with a triumphant tone when describing the development of the Texas Rangers and the final campaigns of the US Army against the Comanche. While Gwynne insists that he is trying not to write a book that sentimentalizes or romanticizes the Comanches, he seems too eager to describe in gory detail the violence Comanche raiders and warriors directed at white settlers and other Native American Nations. While Gwynne does seem to be fascinated by the Comanches, to appreciate their ability to dominate a huge amount of territory, resist European encroachment on that territory, and even to admire the culture and lives of what he refers to as "free Comanches," the tone of Empire of the Southern Moon, feels white supremacist, and to describe it as in the tradition of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee is very misleading. Despite the racist language and gratuitous description of violence, Gwynne does offer some useful insight into the strategy and politics of violence in westward expansion/resistance. I particularly found the following passage from the chapter "War to the Knife" describing a period of rapid expansion of white settlement in terrioroty claimed both by Texas and the Comanches during 1850s. After describing a Comanche raid on a white settlement and the killing of a particular white woman of that settlement, and explaining that white "Frontier people" would have seen "Martha Sherman's death as the radom and senseless slaughter of a Christian woman by a tribe whos primitive, godless, and sub human nature it was to do such things," Gwynee goes onto write: "But her death was neither random nor senseless. She was as much a victim of colliding political and social forces as she was of the arrows and knives of Peta Nocona's raiders." (Peta Nocona was Quannah Parker, the Comanche leader that Gwynne tries to build his narative around.) Her death meant something. It was the consequence of the unprecedented invaision of Comancheria by white settlers that had taken place at the end of the 1850's. The land she lived on was [... the] lush, open, long-grass prairie [...] and encompassed the rich and ancient buffalo ground that my Comanches had been fighting for since the early 18th century. [...] She and [her husband] Ezra were part of that clamorous. chaotic, and brazenly aggressive lunge into the enemy's territory. The Comanches saw it that way because there was no other way for them to see it." It was because of passages like this that I kept reading this book. That and because where else am I going to encounter a detailed popular history of resistance to European expansion into Texas and the southern plains? I happened to be visiting South Carolina at the time I was reading this book and while there I visited one of the forced labor camps, we white people like to refer to by the dressier name 'plantations.' I was struck both by my visit there and while reading this book that people of color, in order to gain access to their history, have to first wade through white people's racist presentation of white history. Empire of the Summer Moon, contains a lot of information about Comanche history, that Comanche people should have access to, should in fact "own." Preserved forced labor camps in the southern US, contain a lot of history about the lives and work and genealogy of people of African decent, information that Black people should have ready access to, information that Black people should rightfully have "ownership" over. But to get access to that history, that information, a Comanche or African American person would have to fist deal with Gwynne's onslaught of racist language and gratuitous descriptions of violence or some historical sites glorification of "antebellum plantation" life. I guess I knew that this is part of how racism works -part of how history is written by the victors works- but I just hadn't taken in how damaging that could be until reading this book while also visiting a preserved forced labor camp in South Carolina.

  30. 4 out of 5

    Richard

    As noted on the blurb on this book's cover, S.C. Gwynne has chronicled a history of the Comanches, "the most powerful Indian tribe in American history." The book contains an excellent history of how the Comanches grew from a nondescript tribe living in the Wind River country (Wyoming), became early adopters of the horse culture of the plains in the early part of the eighteenth century, and moved south, to become the dominant force among Indian and European-based civilizations in an area comprisi As noted on the blurb on this book's cover, S.C. Gwynne has chronicled a history of the Comanches, "the most powerful Indian tribe in American history." The book contains an excellent history of how the Comanches grew from a nondescript tribe living in the Wind River country (Wyoming), became early adopters of the horse culture of the plains in the early part of the eighteenth century, and moved south, to become the dominant force among Indian and European-based civilizations in an area comprising a good part of the present states of Texas, eastern New Mexico, western Oklahoma, and parts of adjoining states. They became the best horsemen in the world and the military masters of the south plains. Among Native Americans, they excelled at horse breeding, breaking, riding and stealing. This last activity was far from the least important aspect of the Comanches' lives. All Comanche warriors had their herds of horses; they were a measure of wealth as well as the means to move families around the plains, and to mount raiding parties. It was necessary to constantly add new stock to replace horses lost in battles as well as those traded and sold. Another tribal need was based on the low birth rates of the Comanches and the deaths of young men in wars. The Comanche simply couldn't survive as a tribal unit without constantly finding horses, and taking captives in Texas, New Mexico and Mexico. "Empire of the Summer Moon" is concerned with about the last forty of the 170 years of the Comanche plains empire. The book's immediate timeline starts at the period encompassing the arrival of the Americans into Texas in the 1830's, as Gwynne states, shouldering their way up the Colorado, Guadalupe, Trinity and Brazos rivers, and over two decades, moving into the Indian hunting grounds, starting with the Cheyenne territories. Over several decades, the Americans increased their numbers dramatically, especially after the Texas Republic was established following the defeat of the Mexican army in 1836. As Gwynne notes (p. 130), people poured "giddily" into the West even though there was ample evidence that the need to push further west into the Texas interior to find fresh ground to build farms placed pioneers in great peril from Indian raiding party visits by the light of the full moon. Many such encounters transpired on the Texas plains, often with tragic results. Gwynne pulls no punches in describing the horrible fate encountered by settler families overtaken in their homes by Comanches. But this book is not just an excellent history of those times. It is also a story of the offspring of a family whose fate, according to Gwynne, has been taught to generations of Texas schoolchildren. Specifically, it is the story of a nine-year-old girl, Cynthia Parker, who grew up among the Comaches and gave birth to a son we know as Quanah Parker, who would one day be a famous war chief of his tribe. Cynthia and four other captives were taken by the Indians after an attack on Parker's Fort in May, 1836. The extended Parker family had built a strong, stockaded fort in the wilderness, where about twenty or so people resided. A Comanche attack led to five Parker deaths and the taking of Cynthia, Rachel Kellogg and her fourteen-month son, Rachel's aunt Elizabeth, and Cynthia's seven-year-old brother John. The captives would be literally dragged over the plains day and night on horses by the Comanches. Women, from teenaged years on up, would be constantly beaten and raped. In the Parker case, all of the captives were eventually split up, with Indian families taking the adults for slave labor, including, as Gwynne notes in detail, the constant need to gut killed buffalo and clean their hides. Rachel would have her son torn from her arms and murdered. Rachel would make a daring escape later, and would write the best-known account of the ordeal of an Anglo-European woman forceably taken by an Indian tribe. Elizabeth and John would be ransomed some time later. The only one of these captives who seemed, for a long time, to have vanished for good was Cynthia. In reality, she was taken into a Comanche family and raised as one of their own. Gwynne describes how captives, usually children, could suddenly have the brutality of their existence changed when they became one of the "loved ones", an outsider taken into the bosom of a tribe. After about ten years of this new life, a Texas peace delegation would discover that the long-lost Parker girl was still living. What shocked them, and subsequent others, was that neither the tribe nor Cynthia were interested in her repatriation to her original family. Her family, in the meantime, wanted her back, along with her other captured relatives. Her uncle, James Parker (Rachel's father) would become somewhat famous for his continued trips into Indian lands, five times from 1836 to 1837, with additional excursions from 1841 to 1844. All of these trips were extremely risky, involving traveling in hostile territory, and costly to a man who had hardly any money to buy clothing and survival equipment. James was instrumental in finding Elizabeth and raising the money, with help from his friend Sam Houston, to ransom her. His exhaustive efforts were the inspiration for the John Wayne role of Ethan, an uncle searching for years to find his captured niece played by Natalie Wood, in John Ford's epic movie "The Searchers", according to Gwynne. Actually, the Ford film was based on the novel "The Searchers" by Alan LeMay, in which the lead John Wayne-based character, named Amos Edwards, is inspired by James Parker (Gwynne lists the LeMay book in his bibliography). It is interesting, as Gwynne notes, that James is not known to have had contact with Cynthia when she was finally returned to her family years later. That event was made possible by the "Battle of Pease River" in December of 1860. By that time, Cynthia, now named "Nautdah" was living in a large Comanche encampment on Mule Creek. She was the wife of a war chief named Peta Nocona. She had three children, twelve year old Quannah, his ten year old brother Peanut and an infant girl, Prairie Flower. The times were extremely brutal, with Comanches and their allied Kiowas killing civilian families in large numbers. There had been decades of government efforts to pursue and punish the Indians, utilizing the army and the Texas Rangers (whose history is told in fascinating detail by Gwynne). By 1860, the violence was almost unbearable, with Peta Nocona among the most active killers of settlers. An expedition consisting of regular army, Rangers and Indian scouts was sent to Mule Creek after intelligence located the Indians there. By the time the Americans arrived in the area, however, most of the natives had left, with just a few remaining families packing up their belongings to move on. The Indian village was attacked, and what ensued was what Gwynne calls "more of a butchery than a pitched battle." (p. 176). About sixty men fought about fifteen Indians. Most of the latter were women, who were spared by the Rangers but not by the soldiers. Everything in the camp which was not looted was destroyed. Fleeing Indians were pursued. Among those were Peta Nocona and all of his family. An Indian fighter, later to become a famous Texas politician, Sul Ross, captured Nautdah and her daughter, then caught up with Peta Nocona and killed him. Quanah and his brother were pursued for several days but were able to find sanctuary in a larger village and avoid capture. Thus began the second captivity of Cynthia Parker and the years-long struggle of her son to grow to manhood without his family. Gwynne points out that those chronicling Cynthia's life over the decades did not fully realize that this second instance in her life of having loved ones killed in her presence, and being torn from her relatives was more cruel than her first captivity. Now she was able to fully fathom her loss, after becoming a functioning adult in, admittedly, a Stone Age society. She had had a life of constant toil, but also had a tribal identity, immersed in the seasonal cycles of the plains and the rituals of the natives, and suddenly that was all gone, to be replaced with a life of being shunted among various Parker relatives, and always being a freakish curiosity to the public at large which sometimes intruded in order to get a look at her. Quanah would spend years hoping to see his mother again, but she would pass away several years after her daughter died. Gwynne describes how Quanah became notable for his strength and bravery, rising to the status of a war chief as great, or more than, his father attained. This meant of course that he would become a great horseman, warrior, killer of homesteaders and Mexicans, horse stealer, kidnapper. He would enjoy the open warfare rampant on the Texas frontier after the Civil War, but would also live to see the severe diminishment of the numbers of Comanches through disease, and as a result of the U.S. government's new policies of aggressively sending military forces into Indian lands. The plains were becoming denuded of their vast Buffalo herds and the once distinctive identities of separate Comanche bands was becoming muddled. Finally, in June 1875, Quanah, this "hardest of hard cases" (p. 289) surrendered to Colonel Ranald MacKenzie and agreed to live with his family on reservation land at Fort Sill. The surrender resulted in a new beginning for Qhanah. His distinctive attitude of never looking back allowed, as Gwynne says, this fierce, charismatic, true killer of a warrior to become a tax-paying American citizen, engaging in ranching and herding, and prospering to the extent that he would spend his years in a large house with, eventually, his seven wives and twenty-three children. He would support white adopted children and have white as well as Native American sons-in-law. He would even be a member of his local school board. Several years after his surrender he would be granted permission from his new friend MacKenzie to lead a buffalo hunt for old times sake back in the old hunting grounds, only to find that there was nothing left to hunt. This was a most extraordinary time, when the West was forever transformed. It has been the subject of great fiction, from the likes of authors such as Alan LeMay, Michael Blake and Larry McMurtry. In this book, S.C. Gwynne provides a non-fiction background of the dangerous Texas frontier that is every bit as interesting to read as any novel of the same subject.

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.